I have tried to abstain from the nonsense of the yes/no debate of Prop 8. But I have recently been introduced to several different ads against (and for I might add) the proposition that shocked and appalled me.
For those of you who have not figured this out yet, I am a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. I am not ashamed of my religion, nor was I forced to donate money to the cause of proposition 8. Honestly I never really heard anything about it in my Sunday Church Meetings. I am also not a California resident. I claim to be apathetic, especially in the realm of politics, but sometimes my opinion needs to be heard and understood.
Some of the ads that jarred me most were the misinformed ads demonizing Mormons, and their leaders. They took their words and used them to support their own purposes. I was in TV production in Highschool and I can tell you now that if I wanted to promote tolerance and respect I could make a video using only sound bites from Adolf Hitler and make a pretty convincing video. If there is anything that I detest more than yellow journalism, it is poorly done yellow journalism. With this thought I turn to my next issue.
“I hate those ‘haters.’” With these words more irony is contained than in any sentence spoken in history (With the exception of some statements by Moliere). How can you hate those that hate and not grow to hate yourselves? Is there something wrong with a person that believes in reincarnation? Is there a reason why a person cannot see marriage as it has been seen for hundreds of years without being seen as ‘medieval’?
Terms have changed, ask any person studying linguistics and they will tell you this, but is there a reason why a different form of union cannot have a different form of name? If a man and a man want to be together they can have one term associated with their union, the same for a woman and a woman, but they do not need to use the term ‘marriage.’ To quote Shakespeare ‘a rose by any other name would still smell as sweet.’ The sweetest part of this change in terminology (not rights) would be to alleviate the fight for marriage. Just use a different term, with the same rights.
I do not want to hear your claims that marriage should be based on love. If that is the case, I have one more question for you, do you agree with polygamy? One could argue that polygamy is based off of love; therefore we should legalize that practice as well. I am fully against reinstating polygamy, does this categorize me as a hater?
One more thing that irked me (On either side) was the astounding lapse of logic used in presenting their arguments. Why is it that one can purport to be ‘tolerant’ and ‘forward thinking’ when all they can say is ‘Why Society is Dumb?’ or Protect Families?. Both sides had gaping hoels in their arguments. Please be articulate when you are arguing your point, or just don’t argue it at all.
*After this rant I would like to add that issues like this are why I am not a political science major. I don’t know how one can cope with society as well as that…oi. I respect Political science majors, you guys are amazing.

Recent Comments